Legal Basis for Processing
Every processing activity needs an identified Article 9 legal basis. For consumer apps, explicit consent must be freely given, specific, and withdrawable.
Health data is Article 9 special category — GDPR's highest tier, demanding legal basis, data subject rights, DPAs, privacy by design, and transfer mechanisms built into the architecture.
Every processing activity needs an identified Article 9 legal basis. For consumer apps, explicit consent must be freely given, specific, and withdrawable.
EU individuals hold rights of access, erasure, and portability. Systems must locate, extract, and delete a person's data across every storage location.
A DPA — the GDPR equivalent of a HIPAA BAA — is required with every cloud provider, analytics platform, and sub-processor touching EU health data.
Article 25 mandates data protection from the earliest design stage. Data minimization, purpose limitation, and access controls are architecture decisions.
EU-to-U.S. flows require Standard Contractual Clauses backed by a Transfer Impact Assessment confirming the recipient country protects the data.
Breaches must be reported to the supervisory authority within 72 hours. High-risk breaches also require notifying affected individuals — procedures must be ready in advance.
From legal basis to cross-border transfers — five steps that determine whether a healthcare app can lawfully operate in EU markets.
Each consequence traces to a specific compliance gap.
Book a Free ConsultationEach requirement maps to specific architecture, legal, and operational decisions — built in, not bolted on.
A documented lawful basis for special-category health data — explicit consent, obligation, or research.
Rights to access (within one month), erase, port, restrict, object, and rectify data on request.
GDPR's counterpart to HIPAA's BAA — required with every sub-processor touching EU health data.
Article 25: data protection built into the architecture — minimization, role-based access, and audit logging.
EU data leaves the EEA only via a lawful mechanism — Standard Contractual Clauses or localization.
72-hour supervisory-authority notification with classification criteria and incident response procedures.
Data protection tooling, EU-residency cloud, and consent platforms — selected to satisfy GDPR Article 25 privacy by design and data subject rights.
Legal basis, privacy by design, DPAs, SCCs, and 72-hour breach response — built in from the first design decision, not added after.
Book a GDPR Consult
100 Fastest Growth Companies
Global Spring Winner
Top App Development Company
AWS Partner Network
Google Cloud Partner
Highly Rated on Trustpilot
Verified Agency
Top App Development Company
ASSOCHAM Member
Yes. GDPR applies whenever a service is directed at or used by EU individuals — there is no volume exception. It applies regardless of where the company is based.
Both govern how a vendor processes health data, but under different frameworks: a BAA covers HIPAA PHI, a DPA covers GDPR obligations. Companies subject to both need both — though one well-drafted document can satisfy each.
PIPEDA holds EU adequacy status, so EU-to-Canada transfers don't require SCCs federally — but that doesn't extend to provincial health laws like Ontario's PHIPA. Quebec's Law 25 adds GDPR-like requirements for health data since 2023.