$9M
Your Payers Are Keeping Up to $9 Million a Year of Your Revenue. The Claims Were Processed, Accepted, and Paid — Just at the Wrong Rate.
Underpayment recovery software that detects payer payment variances from 835 ERAs, validates contract rates, and automates disputes through to resolution.
See it working on your own workflows. We reply within 24 hours.
From real-time 835 ERA payment variance detection and payer contract rate library management to automated dispute generation, COB shortfall recovery, prompt pay compliance enforcement, and contract renegotiation intelligence — the AI Underpayment Recovery Agent covers every mechanism through which commercial payers systematically underpay provider claims.
Every 835 ERA is parsed at line-item level — extracting payment amount, CARC, RARC, procedure code, and payer plan identifier per service line for real-time contract-rate cross-reference.
Upload contracts once — AI extraction reads fee schedules, carve-out provisions, rate effective dates, and bundling rules into a queryable rate library.
At variance confirmation, a payer-specific dispute letter auto-generates — citing contract clause, payment received, contractual allowable, and recovery demand — ready for submission without manual drafting.
Every secondary payer remittance is validated against the primary EOB — confirming correct COB methodology and payer sequencing under Medicare Secondary Payer rules.
48 states mandate prompt payment of clean electronic claims. The agent flags every claim paid outside the statutory window and calculates interest due under each state's prompt pay statute.
Live view of variance exposure by payer, open dispute volume, recovery rate by type, urgency queue, and year-over-year underpayment trends.
Underpayments don't appear in your denial worklist because the claim was paid — just at the wrong rate.
Get Your Underpayment Assessment
Every number comes from production revenue-cycle deployments — measured live, not projected in a pitch deck.
Your Payers Are Keeping Up to $9 Million a Year of Your Revenue. The Claims Were Processed, Accepted, and Paid — Just at the Wrong Rate.
of paid claims contain a payment variance (Experian Health / Advisory Board benchmark) — the majority accepted silently because payment posting systems have…
Enterprise customers trusting Bonami X AI for mission-critical healthcare and revenue cycle operations.
Autonomous monitoring with real-time alerts — continuous automated intervention across every workflow.
Drag, click, or use the dots to walk through each reason.
The AI Underpayment Recovery Agent integrates with your existing ERA delivery infrastructure — clearinghouses, EHR payment modules, and practice management billing systems — reading remittance data from your current payment posting workflow and adding the contract-rate cross-reference layer that your payment posting system was never designed to include.
Every underpayment your payment posting system accepts as a contractual adjustment without a contract-rate cross-reference is revenue your payer contractually owes and your health system will never recover once the dispute window closes.
Book an Underpayment Recovery Demo
From real-time 835 ERA payment variance detection and payer contract rate library management to automated dispute generation, COB shortfall recovery, prompt pay compliance enforcement, and contract renegotiation…
Every 835 ERA is parsed at line-item level — extracting payment amount, CARC, RARC, procedure code, and payer plan identifier per service line for real-time contract-rate cross-reference.
Upload contracts once — AI extraction reads fee schedules, carve-out provisions, rate effective dates, and bundling rules into a queryable rate library.
At variance confirmation, a payer-specific dispute letter auto-generates — citing contract clause, payment received, contractual allowable, and recovery demand — ready for submission without manual drafting.
Every secondary payer remittance is validated against the primary EOB — confirming correct COB methodology and payer sequencing under Medicare Secondary Payer rules.
48 states mandate prompt payment of clean electronic claims. The agent flags every claim paid outside the statutory window and calculates interest due under each state's prompt pay statute.
Live view of variance exposure by payer, open dispute volume, recovery rate by type, urgency queue, and year-over-year underpayment trends.
Get in touch
Talk to a healthcare revenue integrity specialist — get a live demo of the Underpayment Recovery Agent running against your ERA data and an underpayment assessment identifying your current variance exposure by payer, fee schedule error category, and estimated annual recovery opportunity.
Denial management addresses claims that are rejected or denied by the payer — claims that did not result in payment. Underpayment recovery addresses claims that were paid, but paid at a rate below the contractually agreed amount.
Underpayments cluster around six primary cause categories: Fee schedule year error (the payer applies a prior contract year's rates to current-year claims — most common in January and February when fee schedule effective dates roll
The payer contract rate library is built through AI-assisted contract document ingestion: contract PDFs, Word documents, and spreadsheet-based fee schedules are uploaded to the agent's contract management module, where document AI and NLP extract the fee schedule tables, carve-out provisions, rate effective dates, bundling rules, modifier adjustments, and applicable geographic or facility qualifiers into a structured, queryable rate database.
The agent handles non-standard remittance formats through two mechanisms: AI-OCR for paper and image-format EOBs (paper EOBs are digitised through a document scanning workflow, and the AI-OCR layer extracts claim number, service lines, payment amounts, and adjustment reason codes from the printed remittance layout — converting the paper document into the same structured data format as an 835 EDI transaction); and non-standard electronic format parsing (proprietary electronic remittance formats from payers that do not support full 835 EDI are ingested through a configurable format parser that maps the payer's proprietary payment data fields to the equivalent 835 data elements).
Whether prompt pay interest recovery is financially material depends on your payer mix, the state where services are delivered, and your payers' actual payment timing.
The agent integrates as an enhancement layer within your existing payment posting workflow. When a 835 EDI transaction arrives at your clearinghouse (Availity, Waystar, or Change Healthcare/Optum) or is downloaded from a payer portal, the agent receives a copy simultaneously with your payment posting system — reading the ERA data, running the contract-rate cross-reference, and posting identified variances to the recovery queue before or concurrently with payment posting staff applying the remittance to the patient account.
ROI from underpayment recovery automation materialises in two distinct phases. Retroactive recovery (months 1–6): the agent performs a baseline audit of paid claims from the preceding 12–24 months — identifying historical underpayments for which dispute submissions are still possible.
This is a legitimate operational concern, and managing the payer relationship dimension of underpayment recovery is part of how Bonami's programme is designed. The agent generates disputes that are professionally formatted, specifically documented, and contractually grounded — citing the specific contract provision, fee schedule entry, payment received, and calculation of the recovery due.