98%
Multi-specialty Group (18 providers) — 19% denial rate, AR days at 52. → Denials 2.8%, AR days 14, manual work down 60%.
An end-to-end platform fixes the handoffs. Data flows from scheduling through payment without manual re-entry, errors are caught before they propagate, and the AI layer sees the full claim journey rather than one phase of it.
Capture insurance and demographic data upfront, flag visits needing prior auth, and get billing right before the encounter.
Real-time eligibility at scheduling and check-in — deductible, copay, coinsurance estimated accurately upfront.
Flag which procedures need authorization, pre-populate requests from clinical docs, and alert before expiration.
Automated capture from clinical documentation with discrepancy flagging. Mobile entry fast enough staff use it.
AI-assisted ICD-10 and CPT suggestions, gaps flagged before audit, and provider queries that fix docs pre-claim.
Pre-submission validation against payer rules. Failed claims are held and routed for correction, not denied.
EDI 837 submission with real-time 277 status tracking, rejection management, and automated resubmission.
ERA-based denial categorization by root cause, in-system appeal routing, and pattern reporting for the fix.
Automated ERA posting and EOB entry, with every payment compared to contracted rate — variances flagged.
Cost estimates, statements, payment plans, and reminders calibrated to balance and history.
Payer terms maintained for real-time adjustment, plus analytics on underpayment and renegotiation.
They have six or seven smaller ones that add up to one. Point solutions don't fix the handoffs between steps — where most leakage happens. An end-to-end platform fixes them.
Talk About Your RCM
Each platform below replaced a revenue cycle that was leaking money. The numbers are measured in production, not projected in a pitch deck.
Multi-specialty Group (18 providers) — 19% denial rate, AR days at 52. → Denials 2.8%, AR days 14, manual work down 60%.
Oncology Practice — Auth gaps and incomplete drug-cost capture. → Auth denials gone, drug recovery up 22%, coding errors down 85%.
Behavioral Health Network (8 locations) — Time-based coding errors. → Clean claim rate from 69% to 97%.
Ambulatory Surgery Center — Implant capture missing, underpayments untracked. → Implant recovery up 31%, $180K/quarter recovered.
DSO Dental Group (25 locations) — 25 billing operations, no group visibility. → Unified RCM, group denial rate down 60%.
Home Health Agency — Documentation and billing disconnected. → Medicare compliance 100%, AR days 61 to 22.
We design the handoffs first and build the steps around them. Drag, click a card, or use the dots to walk the approach end to end.
Every setting has its own payer mix, coding requirements, and revenue cycle failure points. Here's where we've built end-to-end platforms that collect more of what the clinical team earned.
Across the full cycle, not just one step — spanning scheduling to collections. Hover a card to see what each model does.
Trained on your denial history, scoring every claim for denial risk before submission.
Specialty-calibrated AI reads documentation and suggests codes at your payer mix's required specificity.
Current payer auth rules applied at ordering, flagging procedures and meds needing prior auth.
Every payment matched against contracted rates, surfacing underpayments with documentation to pursue recovery.
Outstanding claims scored by recovery odds, urgency, and dollar value, so staff work top AR first.
Denials traced to upstream causes like scheduling gaps and documentation so fixes hit the real source.
Collecting ninety-five percent of what you earn takes constant effort. The five percent that doesn't get collected isn't lost because the care wasn't delivered — it's lost because the infrastructure wasn't built to protect it.
Book a Discovery Call
Compliance is a design constraint wired in from day one, not a review step before launch.
Patient data protected across every region you operate in.
Independently audited security and PCI-compliant payment flows.
X12 transaction set and billing rules built in as maintained logic.
Coding and fee-schedule standards calibrated to your payer mix.
Built to the price-transparency and patient-protection rules.
STARK and Anti-Kickback considerations built into billing logic.
Get in touch
Thirty minutes. No pitch. An honest discussion about where your revenue cycle is losing money and what closing those gaps would actually require.
The highest ROI steps are the repetitive, rules-heavy ones: eligibility verification, prior authorization automation, medical coding, denial management, underpayment recovery, and cash application. Each runs as an agent with human review, so your team approves the work instead of doing it.
Either. Most clients start by adding AI agents on top of their current billing system to automate specific steps, then expand. If you need the full platform, we build it end to end. All 32 of our production agents integrate with existing systems rather than forcing a rip and replace.
Point software automates one or two steps. An end-to-end platform connects every step in one system where data flows without re-entry, errors are caught before they propagate, and the AI sees the full claim journey. The difference shows up in the handoffs — where most leakage happens.
A single-specialty platform typically runs five to eight months. An enterprise platform across multiple specialties, locations, and complex payers with full AI runs ten to sixteen months. You get a milestone-based timeline after discovery.
Migration scope — claims, AR aging, payment history, patient balances — is defined during discovery. We tell you what migrates cleanly, what needs transformation, and what the parallel operation looks like. Nothing is discovered at go-live.
We extract two to three years of historical claims with outcomes during the build. Denial prediction, coding, and AR prioritization models are trained and validated before launch, and keep improving on live data.
Yes — and this is where custom builds beat commercial options. We configure specialty-specific coding, payer rules, and documentation requirements within one unified platform rather than separate systems that don't share data.
You do. Full IP transfer at project close — source code, documentation, trained model artifacts. No per-claim fees, no licensing that scales with your billing volume.