From Review Bottlenecks to Continuous Quality Gating
Reviewers focus on architecture, not mechanics.
Code review eats 2–4 senior-engineer hours daily. We automate the mechanical 80%.
Reviewers focus on architecture, not mechanics.
Style comments gone — every comment is substantive.
Security findings land inline, while code is fresh.
SAST, complexity, coverage, and PR comments.
76% of apps carry vulnerabilities at first production scan — average fix time 205 days (Veracode). The pre-screener strips the mechanical issues consuming 60–80% of review time, making every hour 4–5x more productive.
Get Quality Audit
100 Fastest Growth Companies
Global Spring Winner
Top App Development Company
AWS Partner Network
Google Cloud Partner
Highly Rated on Trustpilot
Verified Agency
Top App Development Company
ASSOCHAM Member
Every PR is scanned for quality, security, coverage, and performance gaps.
Java, Python, JS/TS, Go, C#, Ruby, PHP, Rust, plus Terraform and Kubernetes.
AST and taint flow analysis, with false positives typically under 5%.
It complements SonarQube, Snyk, and Semgrep — findings arrive in the PR.
Gates block merge on CVSS 7.0+, credentials, or coverage regressions.
Diff-only analysis runs under 60 seconds; monorepos scope to changed modules.
It summarises the change, ranks findings by severity, and rates overall risk.
Live in 1–2 weeks: integrate, baseline scan, then calibrate quality gates.
It reviews every PR the moment it opens — cutting cycle time by 55%.
Beyond linting: SAST, taint flow, complexity, coverage, and CI/CD gates.