Invoice exceptions and accounts payable
Three way match, duplicate and overbilling detection, exception routing with the evidence attached. Cleared a 12,000 invoice backlog for a 3PL and recovered $1.4M. Invoice exception handler.
Not chat. Not a copilot that suggests. Agents that read the document, check the system, make the routine decision, and hand the exceptions to a person with the reasoning attached. Eight of the 32 we run in production:
Three way match, duplicate and overbilling detection, exception routing with the evidence attached. Cleared a 12,000 invoice backlog for a 3PL and recovered $1.4M. Invoice exception handler.
Matches remittances to open items across formats, posts the clean ones, and explains the rest. Reconciliation agent and cash application agent.
Checks coverage, assembles clinical evidence, submits, tracks and escalates. Turnaround from six days to under 24 hours in one deployment. Prior authorization agent, eligibility verification agent.
Reads the RFP, pulls approved answers from your library, drafts the response and flags what has no precedent. RFP response agent.
Compares incoming contracts to your playbook, marks deviations by risk, and drafts the redline for a lawyer to approve. Contract clause review agent.
Continuous vendor monitoring, spend categorisation and requisition advice inside the procurement flow you already run. Vendor risk monitor, spend categorisation.
Flags accounts likely to churn 90 days earlier and keeps CRM data honest without asking reps to do it. 42% less gross churn at a SaaS company. Renewal risk agent.
Answers inbound calls, books, confirms and recalls. A specialty network went from 61% to 94% of calls answered. AI voice agent.
Each number is from a system we assessed, built and shipped. Each card links to the full case study.
See all case studiesAI automation is sold by very different kinds of provider using very different tools. Here is what each one is genuinely good for, and where it stops.
UiPath and Power Automate style bots follow a recorded script. Excellent when the input is structured and the process never changes. They break when a form moves, cannot read a messy PDF, and make no judgment at all. Many organisations already own one and are not using it.
Zapier, Make and n8n connect one app to another and can call a model in the middle. Fast to start and cheap at low volume. They are not built for a process that touches a system of record, needs an audit trail, handles regulated data, or has to run reliably at ten thousand transactions a month.
Most agencies on this search are small teams wiring no code tools together for lead follow up and content. Some are very good at that. Few have shipped anything into an accounts payable ledger, a clinical system or a claims platform, or carry the compliance obligations that come with doing so.
The end state we work toward with every client. The risk is starting here: a team learning production AI on a live financial or clinical process without having seen what goes wrong. Bring that experience in for the first agent, then own the rest.
32 agents in production across finance, procurement, sales, IT and clinical operations. Custom built against your APIs, with confidence thresholds the process owner approves, a shadow run before anything acts alone, every action logged with its reasoning, and delivery to HIPAA and SOC 2 Type II controls. You own the code.
If the process is too inconsistent to define thresholds for, if volume is too low to justify the build, or if a rules engine would do the job at a tenth of the cost, we say so in the assessment. An automation that has to be babysat is worse than the manual process it replaced.
Vendor neutral by design. We recommend what fits your data, your cloud and your compliance obligations, then build on it. The models are the cheap part; the retrieval, evaluation, human review and audit layers around them are where the engineering lives.
Frontier and open weight models chosen per use case on quality, latency, cost per call and data residency. Never a single vendor bet.
How a model becomes a system that does work: grounded in your documents, able to call your APIs, and stopped by a person when confidence is low.
Built inside the cloud you already run, defined in code so environments are reproducible and auditable.
What lets a regulated organisation run this in production: every prompt and output logged, secrets managed, access controlled, drift watched.
If your organisation has standardised on a platform, we build inside it. The assessment maps our recommendations to what you already license before anything new is proposed.
The same discipline, applied to the processes each sector repeats at scale.
100 Fastest Growth Companies
Global Spring Winner
Top App Development Company
AWS Partner Network
Google Cloud Partner
Highly Rated on Trustpilot
Verified Agency
Top App Development Company
ASSOCHAM Member
It takes a business process that people currently run by hand, usually one involving reading documents, checking systems and making routine decisions, and builds software agents that do that work, escalating the exceptions to a person. The useful distinction is between agencies that wire no code tools together for marketing and sales flows, and engineering teams that build agents into systems of record like an ERP, a claims platform or a clinical system. We are the second kind.
Robotic process automation follows a recorded script against a fixed screen. It is excellent for stable, rule based tasks and breaks the moment a form changes or a document is unstructured. AI automation reads the document, understands intent, checks the relevant system and makes a judgment within approved limits. In practice the two often work together: the agent decides, and an existing RPA bot or API call carries out the action.
The ones where judgment is repeated at high volume against documents and systems: invoice exceptions and three way matching, reconciliation and cash application, prior authorization and insurance eligibility, contract clause review, RFP drafting, vendor risk monitoring, renewal risk, and inbound call handling. All eight are agents we already run in production. The assessment scores your candidates on volume, consistency, value and data readiness, and the first one is usually obvious once those are on one page.
Every decision in the process gets a confidence threshold the process owner approves in writing: act alone above it, route to a person below it, never automate certain decisions at all. Before go live the agent runs in shadow for two to four weeks, making every decision while a person still executes, so you see its accuracy against theirs with nothing at stake. In production every action is logged with its reasoning, and exceptions go to a named queue. Thresholds only widen as measured accuracy holds.
Process mapping and threshold design take two to three weeks. Build and integration four to eight depending on the systems involved. Shadow run two to four. So a first agent typically acts alone in production ten to fourteen weeks after kickoff, with a measured accuracy record before it does. Additional agents on the same systems are faster because the integration work is already done.
The assessment is a fixed fee. The build is quoted as a fixed price after it, because by then the process, the systems and the integrations are known, and it runs from the tens of thousands of dollars for a single agent on well documented APIs upward with integration count and data complexity. Ongoing cost is a monthly figure for hosting, model usage, monitoring and support, not a per transaction fee that grows with volume. The business case is built on your own volumes and labour costs before you commit to anything.
Not for anything that touches a system of record, handles regulated data, or needs an audit trail. Those tools are excellent glue between SaaS applications at low volume and we will say so when they are the right answer. For finance, procurement, clinical and claims processes we build engineered agents against your APIs, in your cloud, with logging and access controls a regulated organisation can pass an audit with.
Yes. Agents integrate through the systems' APIs, and where an API does not exist we scope the connector first. We have integrated with major ERPs, CRMs, practice management systems and EHRs including Epic, Oracle Health and athenahealth. The assessment includes a systems inventory precisely so the integration cost is known before the build is quoted.
Agents run in your cloud or ours under your controls, with role based access, secrets management, and sensitive data redacted before it reaches a model where the use case allows. Every prompt, output and action is logged immutably. In healthcare we work under a Business Associate Agreement to HIPAA and HITECH; across sectors we deliver to SOC 2 Type II controls. Your data is never used to train models.
A weekly report shows volume handled, accuracy against the thresholds, exceptions raised, and the hours and money returned. Model drift and integration failures are monitored and alert us before they reach your queue. Your team is trained to own the thresholds and the exception queue, so the system improves after we step back. Support continues on a monthly agreement for as long as you want it, and you own the code either way.
Bring it to a thirty minute call. We will tell you whether it can be automated safely, what the agent could decide alone, what it would hand to a person, and roughly what it would return. If it is not worth automating, you will hear that too. Not sure where to start? Begin with an AI readiness assessment, or see the full catalogue at Bonami X-AI.
Book an Automation Assessment